Auto Shanghai 2015: The most impressive Chinese carmakers (3/5)

60. Foton Tunland Big FootConsistently loud: Foton

This is Part 3 of my ranking of the most impressive Chinese carmakers at Auto Shanghai 2015. You can check out Part 1 (from #35 to #21) here and Part 2 (from #20 to #11) here. We are now entering the Top 10 most impressive brands, and by now most of the feedback I have for these carmakers is positive. Without further ado…

10. (25) Foton

Most Chinese manufacturers are too busy trying to hide their cheapskates past and climb up the premium ladder with more designs and improved quality (all commendable efforts by the way), that they forget to carve themselves a unique positioning in the market. Not Foton. The manufacturer is a heavy/medium truck specialist, notably through a joint-venture with Daimler selling its products under the Auman brand, ubiquitous on any Chinese construction site (or Mongolian, Vietnamese…).

62. Foton Sauvana interior63. Foton Sauvana interior 2Foton Sauvana interior

The brand only dabbles in the passenger car segment, and in Shanghai they launched the Sauvana SUV and the Toano van, two of their better-designed offerings to-date. The music was old-fashioned and loud, the press conference was Wheel of Fortune-loud, the ‘Big Foot’ style Tunland pickup was loud and the V3 microvan equipped with huge speakers was very loud. So why on earth would I place Foton at #10? Because their positioning is totally unique among domestic (and foreign) brands present in China.

61. Foton V3The Foton V3 “Nightclub” – the back door unveils the mother of all loudspeakers…

Foton is targeting the construction site universe – whether it be the truck drivers that don’t actually own the trucks they drive, the site manager, engineer, etc. It’s smart, they know their target market, don’t shy away from it, embrace it and give them exactly what they want. The Sauvana’s interior has nothing superfluous but is comfortable and sturdy. All the big Chinese lads that were wearing their sunnies inside the hall were sucked in. Everything about Foton’s delivery at Auto Shanghai was consistent. Well done.

74. Baojun 560Baojun 560

9. (12) Baojun

Since Beijing last year, Baojun has simply multiplied its monthly sales in China by 10 thanks to the most successful passenger car launch in the country’s history the 730 MPV, now clocking up 30,000 deliveries each month. So you would forgive them for basking in the glorious sun for a bit. That would be underestimating Baojun. Completely unbeknownst to me and showing another stroke of genius and ballsiness, Baojun clears up all its other models from its stand, including the 730, to make room for what could soon be one of China’s best-selling SUVs: the 560.

75. Baojun 560 interiorBaojun 560 interior

The stand technically also includes the Wuling brand but no models were shown. With a price starting at 80.000 yuan (US$12.900!), a satisfyingly modern design and an interior quality matching the 730, the Baojun 560 has all elements needed to be a hit. I am very impressed by how fast Baojun is tapping into the main trends at play in the Chinese market.

76. Soueast DX7Soueast DX7

8. (18) Soueast

If Haima is still struggling with doing it alone without Mazda influence in its cars, Soueast is making huge progress at emancipating itself from Mitsubishi, and has come a very long way since Beijing. The hero in the Soueast stand was the DX7 SUV, the brand’s very first entrant in the booming segment, sticking very faithfully to the R7 concept presented in Beijing last year. The interior feels expensive and comfortable and I loved how the rotary shifters feel smooth and heavy under the fingers.

76. Soueast DX7 interior77. Soueast DX7 interior 2Soueast DX7 interior

But it doesn’t stop there. The V Cross had some of the best-sounding door ‘clomp’ of the Chinese industry, the Soueast range brochure, matte-covered with shiny Chinese writing, is in the Top 3 premium looking for a Chinese carmaker, and Soueast ticks the new energy box with a good-looking V5 EV presented at the Show. Only few pieces of constructive feedback would be to take a leap of faith and separate oust Mitsubishi models from its stand – yes you produce them too but it will drive potential customers away from your brand. You are doing it right Soueast: the year-on-year improvement is spectacular.

78. Chana Oussan 1Chana Oussan

7. (8) ChangAn

Relaxed presenters at the ChangAn press conference showed a confident brand, an honest interior quality and great door clomps on the ChangAn CS75 and Raeton – among the best for Chinese models – are in line with my observations on the brand last year in Beijing and with the fantastic sales results ChangAn has been delivering of late. If in Beijing a bright pink Eado XT added a touch of playfulness, this year an aggressive bright yellow Eado XT racecar plays a similar role. Although outside of the CS75 and Raeton, most cars feel rather cheap still.

79. Chana Oussan interiorChana Oussan interior

It’s the commercial vehicle stand (technically for the Chana brand) that lifts ChangAn to such a high position in my ranking. Keen hostesses gave away goodie bags to everyone passing by, and that bag tagged along with me all the way to the Russian border in Mohe before dropping dead – a good effort. A charging station keeps people inside the stand and there is a rather cheesy activity with models dancing and jumping around but with this year’s imposed starlet-drought it kept photographers happy and snapping. Big thumps up for clearing the stand of all other models to focus on the all-new Oussan MPV – the same way Baojun did for the 730.

Chana’s Commercial Manager Allen was eager to engage in a friendly yet professional manner with me, asking all kinds of questions about my opinion of Chinese cars and what boxes do they need to tick for me to be satisfied. For once I was the one being interviewed and it was rather refreshing to see. When I asked him why there were no other Chana models were exhibited on the stand, he had the perfect answer: ‘people have known these vehicles for years, so we don’t really need to show them again. If someone is interested I can give them all the information they need’, pulling out leaflets for the entire Chana lineup with a big smile. On top of your game Allen.

80. ChangAn RaetonChangAn Raeton interior

The negative – as is the case for so many Chinese carmakers – is the branding of course: the new Oussan MPV had a Chana logo on it, whereas I was told Chana was ChangAn’s commercial vehicle arm. It, as well as the entire stand, had a distinct passenger vehicle feel. Even Allan was a little confused. Although when you step inside the Oussan, despite the shiny tablets attached to the back of the front seats, the contrast with the sleek exterior design is blatant with a dashboard made of too much shiny plastic. In fact, it looks and feels like this is an MPV manufactured by an LCV company. Oh but wait…

80. Qoros standQoros stand

6. (25) Qoros

Qoros, a joint-venture between Chery and Israeli Corportion, has been touting itself as the most European of Chinese car manufacturers, hiring European designers and engineers to come up with their first offering, the 3 hatchback and sedan. Although their product is very well finished and up to European standards, selling just 39 units in 2014 in their test European country (Slovakia) and less than 4.000 at home in China whereas they claim to be able to produce 150.000 annual units has made me struggle to give Qoros much credibility.

80. Qoros Phev 2 conceptQoros PHEV 2 concept

Auto Shanghai may be the turning point that will change all that. It’s one thing to claim you want to achieve European standards with your cars, but it’s another to convince people they are on the right track. The Qoros press conference was the most relatable culturally to a foreign media audience, using a conversational format between two presenters speaking English the whole time, but the real game changer from Qoros was its stand, mimicking a Euopean café, complete with high stools and tables, a coffee bar and waiters serving complimentary finger food. Granted, this has nothing to do with cars but Qoros is aggressively creating a very distinct and clear brand image for itself that is essential if it wants to achieve the bold targets it has set itself. And it worked wonders at Auto Shanghai: the Qoros stand was packed to the rafters during the entire first media day, something no other manufacturer can claim, whether it be Chinese or foreign.

80. Qoros 3Qoros 3 crossover

About the cars now. If the bright red 3 crossover was nothing really new yet looked extremely sleek, the big novelty on the Qoros stand was the PHEV 2 concept, at once killing three birds/trends with one stone: the SUV, new energy and youth trends. Yes, Qoros is definitely on trend this year but it creatively goes against the grain with the PHEV 2 concept, whose confronting design turns a few conventions on their heads, one being the shape of the headlights, at a 90 degrees angle from absolutely all concept cars exhibited at Auto Shanghai. One thing though: in the midst of all this aspiring European vibe, the PHEV 2 featured big ‘made in China’ badges both on the front grille and on the back bumper, which, although obviously correct, is at odds with the rest of what Qoros is showing us here. So are we European or Chinese?

81. Qoros standQoros stand at Auto Shanghai 2015: packed to the rafters.

80. Qoros CoffeeQoros coffee



from Best Selling Cars - Matt's blog http://ift.tt/1DGaB3k

Tesla Powerwall expands EV battery tech to homes, businesses

Filed under: , , ,

Tesla Powerwall Home Battery system will provide backup energy when needed.

Continue reading Tesla Powerwall expands EV battery tech to homes, businesses

Tesla Powerwall expands EV battery tech to homes, businesses originally appeared on Autoblog on Thu, 30 Apr 2015 23:37:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

from Autoblog http://ift.tt/1HWtvcf

Autoblog's 'OCD' Blipshift t-shirt is now on sale!

Filed under:

You submitted, we voted, and now we can all have t-shirts. Buy one!

Continue reading Autoblog's 'OCD' Blipshift t-shirt is now on sale!

Autoblog's 'OCD' Blipshift t-shirt is now on sale! originally appeared on Autoblog on Thu, 30 Apr 2015 22:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

from Autoblog http://ift.tt/1bI3mS5

Final Mad Max trailer has 27 explosions, we counted

Filed under: , , ,

The last Mad Max: Fury Road trailer before the movie's May 15 release in the US is a fantastic spectacle of car stunts, big explosions and bizarre visuals, including Charlize Theron with a robotic claw for a hand.

Continue reading Final Mad Max trailer has 27 explosions, we counted

Final Mad Max trailer has 27 explosions, we counted originally appeared on Autoblog on Thu, 30 Apr 2015 20:01:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

from Autoblog http://ift.tt/1ExdpU6

What you missed on 4.30.15

We drive the 2017 Jaguar XE and the 2016 Honda HR-V, plus we get a sneak peek at the next-gen Chevy Camaro in today's recap of auto news.

Continue reading What you missed on 4.30.15

What you missed on 4.30.15 originally appeared on Autoblog on Thu, 30 Apr 2015 19:31:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

from Autoblog http://ift.tt/1Ex6lXJ

Mercedes-AMG GT S pit against Porsche 911 Turbo in Evo Deadly Rivals test

Filed under: , , , , ,

Has the Porsche 911 Turbo met its match with the new Mercedes-Benz AMG GT? Evo attempts to answer that question with the latest installment of "Deadly Rivals."

Continue reading Mercedes-AMG GT S pit against Porsche 911 Turbo in Evo Deadly Rivals test

Mercedes-AMG GT S pit against Porsche 911 Turbo in Evo Deadly Rivals test originally appeared on Autoblog on Thu, 30 Apr 2015 18:59:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

from Autoblog http://ift.tt/1QQKC3o

Bitchin’ Indeed: A Visual History of the Chevrolet Camaro

-The Chevrolet Camaro was a rush job, a desperate attempt by GM to meet the challenge presented by the ludicrously successful Ford Mustang.---The introduction of the Mustang in April 1964 caught virtually everyone except Ford off guard. Where was Chevy’s affordable sporty car to compete with the Mustang? The rear-engine Corvair didn’t really cut it and the boxy Chevy II Nova lacked sex appeal. While there had been notions advanced for producing a “Super Nova” of sorts before the Mustang debuted, it wasn’t until the Mustang was a proven hit in August of 1964 that the go ahead was given to rush a comparable car into production. That’s a fully developed car in Chevy showrooms by the fall of 1966—barely more than two years.---The same basic car, known within GM as the F-car, would also show up at Pontiac dealers as the Firebird. But while Pontiac would spin the car its own way, the Camaro was almost fully baked by the time the Firebird was approved for production.---While the Camaro would become the Mustang’s most intense rival, its history doesn’t strictly parallel that of the Ford product. And with five generations of Camaros already behind us, and a sixth on its way, that heritage is worth charting.-To create the Camaro, Chevrolet started with the compact Chevy II Nova (itself a belated response to Ford's Falcon). In much the same way that the first Mustang is mostly a Falcon under its skin, the first Camaro is mostly Nova bits. That includes its hybrid structure of a unibody with a front subframe. But while Novas like this ’65 were in production as the F-car was being developed, the Camaro would be based on the upcoming second-generation Chevy II that would appear as a '68 model.-The first Camaro went on sale in September 1966 with a base price of $2466. Just over 220,000 were sold that first year compared to more than 480,000 Mustangs during the same period. The base engine was a 230-cubic-inch (3.8-liter) straight-six rated at 140 gross horsepower. The option list was long and included four different small-block V-8s and two big-blocks. The top choice was the 375-hp, 396-cubic-inch (6.5-liter) L78 big-block.-Alongside the sport coupe Chevrolet offered the Camaro as a convertible. Priced roughly $240 more than the coupe, just 25,141 convertibles were part of 1967 Camaro production.-The 1967 Indianapolis 500 was paced by a Camaro convertible with a 325-hp version of the 396 big-block V-8 engine under its hood. Chevrolet didn’t produce replicas as such, but there were 100 of these Ermine White convertibles built for Indianapolis Speedway use, most of which were later sold as used cars.-Chevrolet was determined to establish high-performance credentials for the Camaro. It did that with the creation of the 1967 Z/28 powered by the 290-hp DZ302 4.9-liter high-compression V-8. In the hands of team owner Roger Penske and driver Mark Donohue, the Z/28 would prove, after some creative engineering including an acid bath for the body shell, to be racing dynamite in the SCCA Trans Am series. During the 1967 season, Donohue would win three times. In 1968, the same car (redecorated as a ’68) was among those used by Donohue to win 10 of the 13 races that season.-Camaros have long been among America’s most-raced cars. Alongside Donohue’s Camaro, legends like Bill “Grumpy” Jenkins was campaigning Camaros in NHRA drag racing. Here’s Grumpy’s 1968 Camaro on its way to winning the very first Pro Stock title at the 1970 Winternationals.-Changes for 1968 included “Astro Ventilation” that eliminated the need for vent windows. New taillights and grilles were also part of the package. Choosing the RS option included hidden headlights. The SS option included dual exhaust, red-stripe tires, black accents on the grille, and a retuned suspension.-Structurally, the 1969 Camaro was little different from the first two editions. But the bodywork was more voluptuous and slightly provocative. For the second time, a Camaro paced the Indianapolis 500 and this time Chevrolet produced 3675 replicas of this “Z11” convertible with its signature orange houndstooth upholstery. Fully loaded, these Z11s included both the RS and SS packages, plus the new-for-’69 “ZL2” cowl-Induction hood.-The 1969 Z/28 wasn’t mechanically much different from the ’67 and ’68 models, but many consider it the ultimate Camaro in appearance. During the 1969 model year, the Z/28 was joined by two special-order, low volume, and race-oriented models. Built through the Central Office Production Order (COPO) system, they were the COPO 9560 and 9561. The 9561 was powered by the 425-hp, L72 iron-block 427-cubic-inch (7.0-liter) big-block V-8 and many of the examples made went to Yenko Chevrolet in Pennsylvania where they became the Yenko Camaro. Only 69 of the 9560s were built and they were all powered by the all-aluminum ZL-1 big-block also rated at 425 horsepower. Those ZL-1 Camaros built in 1969 are considered the most collectible of them all.-Hot rods are an essential element of the Camaro’s heritage. Over the years, the Camaro has been twisted by its owners into parade floats, jacked up street racers, gilded Pro Street show cars, and a few truly awesome supercars. GM engineer Mark Stielow’s series of first-generation Camaros are thoroughly rebuilt around the vast hoard of aftermarket parts available for the car as well as later-model components adapted to the vehicle.-Even as GM prepared the second-generation Camaro for 1970, C/D was still playing with the ’69. Our ”Blue Maxi” remains one of the magazine’s most indelible project cars. “The Company Car: a dazzling, dizzying blue wonder that had no easy goals to meet,” we wrote. “It would have to handle with its Trans-Am brothers and do us justice on the drag strip. At the same time it would have to be tractable on the highway and it would have to be a credit to its publisher. Mostly it had to represent everything we thought was right about the automobile in an atmosphere of increasing criticism of anything with four wheels—especially four fat wheels.”-The second-generation Camaros didn’t make it to dealers until February of 1970, making them 1970½ models. Bigger than before and lacking a convertible variant, the new Camaro was nonetheless similarly engineered to the first-generation car, with a front subframe and a unibody rear structure.-The Z/28 carried over to the second-generation Camaro, but it was now powered by a 350-cubic-inch (5.7-liter) small-block LT-1 V-8 rated at 360 horsepower. The LT-1 may have sacrificed some of the DZ302’s high-revving charisma, but it was a much friendlier everyday driving companion. The Z/28 in this photo features the new RS front end with its split bumpers and driving lights alongside the grille. The high-back seats indicate that the pictured car is a 1971 model—when a switch to SAE “net” power-rating standards dropped the nominal output of the LT-1 to 330 horsepower.-From C/D’s first road test of the 1970½ Z/28: “Somehow, though, the Z/28 is not as thrilling as it once was. It’s more tolerant to driving techniques now, more mature in its behavior. All things considered, it’s a better engine now but the loss of a care­free and irrepressible adolescent spirit can never be witnessed without some regret. And although the Z/28 seems much tamer now than it once did, the transformation is more a function of the car than of the increase in displacement.”-The second-generation Camaro carried on visually almost unchanged through 1973. And yes, the styling was cribbed from Ferrari. Most obviously GM stole from the 1963 250GT Lusso. The big-block V-8s fell off the menu for 1973.-New federal bumper regulations meant the nose and tail of the Camaro had to be redesigned for 1974. Considering how massive those aluminum bumpers were, the car survived their addition admirably.-The Z/28 got bold new graphics for ’74, but the car itself was becoming fat, lazy, and underpowered. The 350 V-8 under the hood was rated at only 245 horsepower. Yawn. Maybe the Z/28 needed to be gone. And by 1975, it was!-With the excision of the Z/28, the most exciting thing about the 1975 Camaro was the new wraparound rear window that slightly—very slightly—increased rear visibility. This was the first year for catalytic converters and the output of the Camaro engines skidded downward. The six could only wheeze out 105 horsepower while the “big” 350 V-8 was rated at a miserable 145 horsepower when equipped with a two-barrel carburetor or 155 horsepower in California and high-altitude areas where a four-barrel arrested the decline.-In ’75 the Rally Sport option became a paint-and-tape package. Flat black paint in the 1970s was a challenge to protect. Painted bumpers were, um, well, er . . .40 years later, they don’t look so good. Little changed with the ’76 model.-Midway through the 1977 model year the Z28 returned shorn of its mid-name slash. Now emphasizing handling, it rode on big, 15x7-inch wheels and its 350 small-block was rated at a towering 185 horsepower. (In 1977, 185 horses was huge.) Despite this lack of excitement, Chevy sold almost 219,000 '77 Camaros—that was almost three times the sales of its younger, smaller, sport-coupe brother, the Monza.-The big change for ’78 was new soft plastic bumper covers. Also, for the first time, a translucent T-top roof option was also added. Good-looking whitewall tires too.-Here’s the ’78 Z28. The drivetrain carried over from ’77.-The last of the second-generation Camaros were built as 1981 models. That 11-year model run is the longest for a Camaro generation.-Truly all new, the 1982 Camaro used a full unitized structure, a new coil-spring rear suspension, and struts in the front. And for the first time, the Camaro was a hatchback. But while the new Camaro was modern and gorgeous in that flat-plane Eighties way, it was seriously underpowered. Base Sport Coupes were equipped with the heinous 2.5-liter “Iron Duke” four-cylinder rated at 90 horsepower. A 112-hp, 2.8-liter V-6 was optional while the Z28’s base 5.0-liter V-8 with a four-barrel carburetor put out only 145 ponies. But at least that engine could be had with a four-speed manual transmission. Opting for the 165-hp Cross-Fire-injected version of that engine meant going with a three-speed automatic.-In our August 1982 issue, Don Sherman reported this about the new Z28 with Cross-Fire throttle body injection: “When you drive a Z28, there is one engineering breakthrough that slaps you right in the face: This Camaro is not a committee car. The shock valving is so tight that you feel pebbles on the pavement as you back out of a parking space.” Sherman slammed the car’s anemic acceleration however. It took 8.6 seconds for the Camaro to hit 60 mph and the quarter-mile needed a languid 16.4 seconds to go by at 83 mph.-Introduction of the all-new third generation was reason enough for the Camaro to pace the Indianapolis 500 for the third time. Unfortunately the pokey 165-hp, Cross-Fire Injection, 5.0-liter V-8 was the most powerful engine available. That’s not enough for Indianapolis. So the actual pace car was powered by a modified 5.7-liter V-8 that wasn’t offered in a production Camaro.-Neil DeAtley’s two Budweiser-sponsored Camaros dominated the 1983 Trans Am season. Drivers David Hobbs and Willy T. Ribbs took nine of the 13 events in these tube-frame racers. Ribbs won five races, and Hobbs four with John Paul Jr. adding a tenth Camaro win for another team. Hobbs won the championship based on his consistent finishes.-Performance was returning to the Z28 by 1983 with the introduction of the 190-hp L69 version of the 5.0-liter V-8. While it still used a four-barrel carburetor, it was now available with a five-speed manual transmission. This is the ’84 Camaro, which looked almost identical to the ’82 and ’83. GM’s 700R4 four-speed automatic was optional on most Camaro models by ’84.-The big leap forward for Camaro performance in the Eighties was the introduction of the IROC-Z with its spectacular 16-inch, five-spoke wheels. But the best news was the newly available Tuned Port Injected (TPI) version of the 5.0-liter V-8 that delivered a sweet 215 horsepower. And so New Jersey got its official car. And the 1985 Camaro IROC-Z earned a spot on C/D’s 10Best list that year.-Now practically forgotten, the third-generation Camaro was offered in a Berlinetta model with V-6 or V-8 power and an almost hypnotic digital dashboard. Interest in the Berlinetta shrunk to only about 4479 units in ’86 and it wasn’t part of the ’87 lineup. There’s a reason why they’re forgotten.-The 1987 model year brought two good things to the Camaro. First was the return of a convertible model—the first since 1969. And second was the big 5.7-liter TPI V-8 rated at 225 horsepower. It also brought exile of the truly awful Iron Duke four to crap-can purgatory. By ’88 the Z28 name had vanished in favor of IROC. And in ’88 came the brilliant IROC 1LE package which set the Camaro up for startling success in showroom stock racing.-Dodge took up sponsorship of the International Race of Champions in 1990 and with it came the right to use the IROC name. So Chevy went back to Z28 for its high performance Camaro line during the 1990 model year. It was great news if you loved tall rear wings, silly hood scoops, and new five-spoke wheels. By 1992, the third-generation car was a decade old and ready to be replaced.-With rack-and-pinion steering, a new 275-hp 5.7-liter V-8 wearing the LT1 name, and an available six-speed manual transmission, the fourth-generation Camaro Z28 was a startling performer. “(A)ny 3452-pound car that clears the quarter-mile in 14.0 seconds at 100 mph and circles the skidpad at 0.92 g is a tremendous performer,” wrote C/D’s Patrick Bedard in a comparison test the new Z28 won-In 1993, the Camaro paced the Indianapolis 500 for the fourth time. And this time, it did the deed in strictly stock form.-The convertible model returned for the 1994 model year. In 1995, GM’s 3800 3.8-liter V-6 joined the 3400 3.4-liter V-6, giving Camaro buyers their first choice of V-6 powerplants. The 200-hp 3800 was vastly more refined than the 160-hp 3400 and would replace the 3400 entirely by 1996. Meanwhile, output of the LT1 V-8 rose to 285 horsepower in 1996. And beyond that, SLP Engineering brought back an SS model of the Z28 that tweaked the engine to 305 horsepower and fitted 17-inch wheels for the first time.-To celebrate the Camaro’s 30th anniversary, Chevrolet released a white convertible Z28 with orange stripes reminiscent of the 1969 pace car.-The fourth-generation Camaro’s one significant update occurred for the 1998 model year when it got a new face with compound headlights, and the LT1 5.7-liter V-8 gave way to the all-new, all-aluminum 5.7-liter LS-1 V-8 rated at 305 horsepower. GM also brought production of the SS in-house and the free-breathing LS-1 in that machine was now rated at 320 horsepower.-By the turn of the 21st century, the Camaro was both an old product and, seemingly, an irrelevant and archaic one. “Although GM has done a good job of keeping the F-car chassis viable,” wrote our own Tony Swan in 1999, “it’s still a live rear axle setup, and it shows us, once again, that live axles have definite handling limits, particularly on bumpy roads. In this case we found that oversteer was just one injudicious stab of the throttle away, and one tester went so far as to call the Z28’s handling ‘spooky.’ ” Still, it was quick, running from 0 to 60 mph in 5.2 seconds and knocking off the quarter mile in 13.8 seconds at 104 mph. Chevy celebrated the Camaro’s 35th anniversary with a special graphics package on the Z28 SS coupe and convertible, and then killed the car. Seemingly forever.-By 2009, Chevrolet was ready to recognize the error of its ways, and that year it reintroduced the Camaro as a 2010 model. Now based on an Australian Holden chassis with an all-independent suspension, it was offered in base and RS form powered by a 304-hp, 3.6-liter, DOHC 24-valve V-6 or as an SS powered by a 6.2-liter LS-series V-8 rated at a massive 426 horsepower. The major problem with the new car? It was tough to see out of it. “It’s not a Camaro unless it can set fire to a burnout box,” wrote C/D’s Aaron Robinson. “Frankly, we expected the 60-mph mark to arrive sooner than 4.8 seconds.” Oh, how standards had changed.-In 2012, Chevy went nuts and began offering the Camaro in a new ZL1 form powered by a supercharged 6.2-liter V-8 rated at 580 horsepower. How does 0 to 60 in 4.1 seconds sound? Yup, it sounds like, looks like, and goes like it’s the quickest and most capable Camaro yet conceived. It’s a good way to celebrate the car’s 45th anniversary. But that wasn’t the end. First, in 2013, there was a new 1LE. And then in 2014 . . .-The Z/28 came back—harder and better than ever before—and the old-school slash came with it. “The Z/28 is not the quickest, the fastest, or the most powerful Camaro, but it is the most expensive at $75,000, or more than three times the price of a six-cylinder model,” explained our youthful Eric Tingwall. Powered by a naturally aspirated 7.0-liter LS7 V-8 rated at 505 horsepower and wearing enormous 305-mm-wide tires at every corner on 19-inch wheels, the newest Z/28 is optimized and radicalized for on-track dominance. It’s a great way to send out the fifth-generation Camaro. Because a new one is coming for 2016.--

from Car and Driver Blog http://ift.tt/1JEEUQ0